i received this in email do you own research - i dont know enough about its validity

Post Reply
User avatar
NnitehawkK
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 50
Joined: 09 Nov 2017, 13:57

i received this in email do you own research - i dont know enough about its validity

Post: # 1723Post NnitehawkK
28 Feb 2019, 23:47

I thought you should know this. Feel free to contact me any time. I am always happy to help. All The Best. Snoop.


DEBORAH TAVARES AND THE PG&E FAKE EMAIL HOAX (ENERGY BEAMS FROM PG&E SATELLITES STARTED THE CALIFORNIA FIRES HOAX)

For more hoaxes. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthr ... ost1277666


VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX (Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax.).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 11:10-20:00)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3fb--FC_oQ (at 1:05-3:40)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7As3d9NgDyk (at 27:20-30:10)


In the PG&E Satellite Beams Hoax, Deborah Tavares claims to have received PG&E emails which effectively prove that PG&E caused the recent forest fires in California by using satellite-based energy beams fired at California forests. But, her claims about these emails are false. They are FORGERIES.


Pacific Gas & Electric ("PG&E") is a California electrical utility company. Over the next few years, PG&E is required by law to generate an increasingly higher and higher percentage of its electrical power without producing any carbon emissions. So, PG&E has been has been a leader in the use of wind, solar and thermal technology to generate electrical power for its customers.


But, PG&E's conventional, ground-based, solar panels can only collect energy from the Sun during the middle of daylight hours in good weather. So, in 2009, PG&E announced that in the future, solar panels on satellites in space might be used to generate energy from the Sun 24 hours a day. These satellites might then beam the power to Earth using lasers or radio frequencies. The power might then be received at receptor stations and then converted to electricity for the public to use.


WHAT PG&E HAS SAID ABOUT THIS SINCE 2009:
https://www.pge.com/en_US/small-medi...se_link-energy


Solaren is a private California company which has patented the technology described above. In 2009, PG&E entered into a contract with Solaren to buy a finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electrical power using this technology. Under the contract, Solaren would own and control all the satellites, rectennas and all the receiver stations. Originally, Solaren promised to provide PG&E with this finished electricity by 2016. But, it ran into financial problems and still has not delivered on its promise. The California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC") approved the contract on the condition that no money from PG&E customers would ever be used to develop this technology.


THE CONTRACT IS DISCRIBED HERE:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/34239347/n.../#.XHRAB1KFPIU (at paragraphs 1-5)
https://www.afcea.org/content/space-...closer-reality(at paragraphs 8, 9 & 10)
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-light-of-day/(at the final two paragraphs)
https://www.businessinsider.com/spac...r-earth-2014-7(at the final two paragraphs)


Deborah Tavares lives in Sebastopol and has long waged war with PG&E over its "smart meters". So, when the recent forest fires burned northern California, Deborah Tavares wanted to blame PG&E and the future beam technology described above for starting those fires. But, the scientific and economic literature and PG&E's own documents indicated that this future beam technology did not yet exist.


CURRENT SCIENTIFIC & ECONOMIC LITERATURE ON THIS TECHNOLOGY:
This technology will not be in use until the end of the decade. See the last 3 paragraphs and the final sentence here. https://www.businessinsider.com/spac...r-earth-2014-7
This technology did not exist in 2017. Beginning at the bottom of page 16 here.
https://space.nss.org/media/NSS-JOUR...olar-Power.pdf
This technology is not in use in 2019. See the last paragraph. https://www.electricityforum.com/new...ospaceforpower.
This technology did not exist in 2018. See the FIRST and LAST paragraph here. http://earthsky.org/earth/space-base...ser-to-reality
This technology will not be in use until at least 2019. See page 62 http://fiso.spiritastro.net/telecon/...e_12-14-16.pdf
This technology did not exist in 2018. See the final paragraph. http://www.alternative-energy-news.i...ls-into-orbit/


SO, TO REBUT ALL THAT INFORMATION, Deborah Tavares FORGED a series of FAKE emails (purportedly between the CPUC and PG&E) indicating that this beam technology already existed, that it was already in use and that it could be used to create "damaging space weather" for "Earthlings", referring to fires.


THE FORGERIES:
PUBLISHED EMAIL FORGERIES: http://stopthecrime.net/wp/2018/08/2...rn-california/


Afterwards, Deborah Tavares created more FORGED emails reflecting imaginary responses from imaginary experts to which Deborah Tavares allegedly forwarded these FORGED emails above. Not surprisingly, these imaginary experts agreed with Deborah Tavares' assessment that this beam technology existed, that it has long been in use and that it could have been used to kill us all.


TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED FORGERIES AT ABOUT 20% THROUGH THE TEXT HERE: http://smartmetersmurder.com/


THE FINAL TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED FORGERIES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 17:25-18:40)


Thus, Deborah Tavares herself actually created the very FORGERIES which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTE "PROOF" that PG&E used this future beam technology to ignite the recent fires in California to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about these FORGED emails are not so. These FORGED EMAILS prove nothing except that Deborah Tavares is a fraud.


THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THESE PUBLISHED EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:
1. Tavares did not know what "space weather" actually meant (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). "Solar flares" on the surface of the Sun erupt about every 11 years or so. These solar flares extend millions of miles into space and emit extremely high amounts of radiation into space. This radiation is called "space weather" (like a "rain", "storm" or "hurricane" of RADIATION). The radiation emitted during such "space weather" is so powerful that it can damage or destroy power transformers here on Earth if they are linked to earth-based solar panels. This could result in power outages. That is why "damaging space weather" would be of concern to PG&E. During "damaging space weather", PG&E would have to protect its transformers linked to earth-based solar panels because some transformers provide electrical power to nuclear power plants and to hospitals which cannot afford to have power failures for obvious reasons.


But, Deborah Tavares mistakenly believed that "space weather" was weather here on the Earth that was controlled by lasers, radio frequencies or microwaves beamed at the Earth from "PG&E" satellites in space.


So, in FORGING the phrase, "Ah, the good old days" in the 10:04 email above, Deborah Tavares sought to create the illusion that such beam technology (which is still not in use today) was so old that it has been in use since "the good old days."


Further, in FORGING the sentence, "Brian, I assume you're assembling a high level task force of... [despicable people] to handle PG&E's response to the upcoming 'damaging space weather'?" in the 9:50 email above, Deborah Tavares sought to create the illusion PG&E was planning to use this beam technology itself TO CREATE "damaging space weather" here on Earth and then blame its own customers for the consequences, meaning fires (not realizing that "space weather" is actually radiation in outer space caused by solar flares on the surface of the Sun every 11 years).


In FORGING the phrase "...then have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS, aka earthlings, FOR ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENSES RESULTING [FROM DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER]" in the 9:50 email above, Deborah Tavares was referring to FIRES which PG&E can blame on customers, BUT NOT TO POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY SOLAR FLARES ON THE SURFACE OF THE SUN, WHICH CAN NEVER BE BLAMED ON CUSTOMERS (not realizing that "space weather" is actually radiation in outer space caused by solar flares on the surface of the Sun every 11 years).


2. Deborah Tavares did not know the terms of PG&E's contract with Solaren (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). So, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E would never own, operate, manage or control any such satellites, rectennas, receiving stations or have any say in how, when or where energy from satellites in space would be directed. Instead, Solaren, a private corporation, was solely responsible for that. All PG&E would ever do under the contract would be to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren was ever successful in generating electricity in this way. PG&E is future customer of Solaren. Nothing more.


So, in FORGING the sentence, "We [referring to PG&E] have changed our receptor site from the Mojave desert (sic) to Sebastopol" in the 10:03 email above, Deborah Tavares sought to create the illusion that she was so important to PG&E that it was actually "targeting" her with radio frequency waves in her own home town in retaliation for opposition to PG&E "smart meters". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 18:40-19:20)


Further, Deborah Tavares did not know that Solaren's actual receptor site is in Fresno (hundreds of miles away from the Mojave Desert) and that PG&E has no say in where such a Solaren receptor site goes. Moreover, Deborah Tavares did not know that such receiver rectennas are up to six miles in diameter (which would make it visible to every person in Sebastopol if it had actually had been relocated there as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims instead of it remaining in Fresno).


PROOF THAT FRESNO (NOT SEBASTOPOL) IS THE REAL RECEPTOR SITE:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/34239347/n.../#.XHRAB1KFPIU (at the 3rd paragraph)
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-light-of-day/ (at end of 2nd paragraph)
https://www.electricityforum.com/new...ospaceforpower (at the 16th paragraph)


3. Use your own common sense. As to the 10:03 email, how likely is it that a PG&E executive would open an email to the CPUC with a "reminder" of the ACTUAL MECHANICS of exactly how Solaren's technology worked? The CPUC had just approved of PG&E's use of Solaren's technology provided that PG&E never invested any of its customer's money in the project. The CPUC did not need a "reminder" of the ACTUAL MECHANICS of Solaren's technology for which PG&E played no part could take no credit.


4. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would refer to PG&E's customers as "AKA EARTHLINGS" in connection with an email about covering up "damaging space weather"?


5. Use you own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would tell PG&E to have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS "AKA earthlings" FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF "DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER" (NOT FIRES, WHICH CAN BE BLAMED ON CUSTOMERS, BUT POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY SOLAR FLARES ON THE SURFACE OF THE SUN, WHICH CAN NEVER BE BLAMED ON "CUSTOMERS").


THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THE UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:
1. The sentence, "You as a California resident have every right to know what your "public utilities" are doing with their (sic) "RATE DOLLARS", was not written by an expert. But, no "rate dollars" from any PG&E customer has or will ever be used to finance the research and development of this technology (which will remain wholly owned and operated by Solaren). PG&E would merely be a customer of Solaren and buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electricity in this way. Unknown to Deborah Tavares, no customer money will ever be used to develop this future technology.


2. The term, "EARTH, INC." in "comment ONE:" a "signature" term ACTUALLY CREATED, COINED and REPEATEDLY USED BY Deborah Tavares. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...iz.42h9ExblMs8


3. The phrase, "very disturbing" in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares phrase. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...71.ld2pLLtGq-c


4. The term, "FOIA", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...71.MsKCoGqM1QE


5. The term, "iceberg", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...71.brv_lDgjd1o


6. The term, "footprints", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...71.6jJyS4QOIyw


7. The term, "assessment", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...iz.VQSLXAWgla8


8. BOTH "comment ONE:" and "comment TWO:" contain hyphenated terms (" - "), a writing custom rare in today's world, suggesting that BOTH comments ONE and TWO were written by the same person, which of course, they were.


PG&E may actually be using laser or radio frequencies beamed from satellites in space to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THESE PARTICULAR FORGED EMAILS THEMSELVES (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provide no support for that proposition, because they are FORGERIES!


ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.

The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.



Post Reply

Return to “News and Current Events”